Obesity can spread from person to person, much like a virus,
researchers are reporting today. When one person gained weight, their close
friends tended to gain weight, too.
Their study, published in the New England Journal of
Medicine, involved a detailed analysis of a large social network of 12,067
people who had been closely followed for 32 years, from 1971 until 2003. The
investigators knew who was friends with whom, as well as who was a spouse or
sibling or neighbor, and they knew how much each person weighed at various
times over three decades. That let them examine what happened over the years as
some individuals became obese. Did their friends also become obese? Did family
members or neighbors?
The answer, the researchers report, was that people were
most likely to become obese when a friend became obese. That increased a
person’s chances of becoming obese by 57 percent.
There was no effect when a neighbor gained or lost weight,
however, and family members had less influence than friends.
Proximity did not seem to matter: the influence of the
friend remained even if the friend was hundreds of miles away. And the greatest
influence of all was between mutual close friends. There, if one became obese,
the odds of the other becoming obese were nearly tripled.
The same effect seemed to occur for weight loss, the
investigators say. But since most people were gaining, not losing, over the 32
years of the study, the result was an obesity epidemic.
Dr. Nicholas Christakis, a physician and professor of medical
sociology at
“You change your idea of what is an acceptable body type by
looking at the people around you,” Dr. Christakis said.
The investigators say their findings can help explain why
Americans have become fatter in recent years — each person who became obese was
likely to drag some friends with them.
Their analysis was unique, Dr. Christakis said, because it
moved beyond a simple analysis of one person and his or her social contacts,
and instead examined an entire social network at once, looking at how a
person’s friend’s friend’s friends, or spouse’s
sibling’s friends, could have an influence on a person’s weight. The effects,
Dr. Christakis said, “highlight the importance of a spreading process, a kind
of social contagion, that spreads through the
network.”
Of course, the investigators say, social networks are not
the only factors that affect body weight. There is a strong genetic component
at work as well.
Science has shown that individuals have genetically
determined ranges of weights, spanning perhaps 30 or so pounds for each person.
But that leaves a large role for the environment in determining whether a
person’s weight is near the top of his or her range or near the bottom. As
people have gotten fatter, it appears that many are edging toward the top of
their ranges. The question has been why.
If the new research is correct, it may mean that something
in the environment seeded what many call an obesity epidemic, leading a few
people to gain weight. Then social networks let the obesity spread rapidly.
It also may mean that the way to avoid becoming fat is to
avoid having fat friends.
That is not the message they meant to convey, say the study
investigators, Dr. Christakis and his colleague, James Fowler, an associate
professor of political science at the
You don’t want to lose a friend who becomes obese, Dr.
Christakis said. Friends are good for your overall health, he explains. So why
not make friends with a thin person, he suggests, and let the thin person’s
behavior influence you and your obese friend?
That answer does not satisfy obesity researchers like Kelly
Brownell, director of the
“I think there’s a great risk here in blaming obese people
even more for things that are caused by a terrible environment,” Dr. Brownell
said.
On average, the investigators said, their rough calculations
show that a person who became obese gained 17 pounds,
and the newly obese person’s friend gained 5. But some gained less or did not
gain weight at all, while others gained much more.
Those extra pounds were added onto the natural increases in
weight that occur when people get older. What usually happened was that
peoples’ weights got high enough to push them over the boundary, a body mass
index of 30, that divides overweight and obese. (For
example, a six-foot-tall man who went from 220 pounds to 225 would go from
being overweight to obese.)
While other researchers were surprised by the findings, Dr.
Christakis said the big surprise for him was that he could do the study at all.
He got the idea from talk of an obesity epidemic.
“One day I said, ‘Maybe it really is an epidemic. Maybe it
spreads from person to person,’ ” Dr. Christakis recalled.
It was only by chance that he discovered a way to find out.
He learned that the data he needed were contained in a large federal study of
heart disease, the Framingham Study, that had followed
the population of
The study’s records included each participant’s address and
the names of family members. In order for the researchers to be sure they did
not lose track of their subjects, each was asked to name a close friend who
would know where they were at the time of their next exam, in roughly four
years. Since much of the town and most of the subjects’ relatives were
participating, the data contained all that Dr. Christakis and his colleagues
needed to reconstruct the social network and follow it for 32 years.
Their research has taken obesity specialists and social
scientists aback. But many say the finding is pathbreaking,
and can shed new light on how and why people have gotten so fat so fast.
“It is an extraordinarily subtle and sophisticated way of
getting a handle on aspects of the environment that are not normally
considered,” said Dr. Rudolph Leibel, an obesity
researcher at
Dr. Richard Suzman, who directs
the office of behavioral and social research programs at the National Institute
on Aging, called it “one of the most exciting studies to come out of medical
sociology in decades.” The institute financed the study.
But Dr. Stephen O’Rahilly, an
obesity researcher at the
“I don’t want to look like an old curmudgeon, but when you
come upon things that inherently look a bit implausible, you raise the bar for
standards of proof,” Dr. O’Rahilly says. “Good
science is all about replication, but it is hard to see how science will ever
replicate this.”
